Dismissed
Vishnu Baburao Sarode v. Vishnu Bhaulal Chumbalkar and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/233/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
233.2012 CWP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 233 OF 2012
Vishnu S/o Baburao Sarode PETITIONER
VERSUS
Vishnu S/o Bhaulal Chumbalkar & others RESPONDENS
Shri Vijay Sharma, Advocate for petitioner Shri N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent No. 4 / State
CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J. DATED : 28th March, 2012.
PER COURT :
the parties and considering the say to the application (Exh. 141),
2
233.2012 CWP
observed that the reasons and the material sought to be brought on record are necessary for just decision of the case, and no prejudice would be caused to the accused by recalling a witness and, in fact, would help both the parties and the Court to come to the correct conclusion vide order dated 14/2/2012.
SDM* MARCH-2012
Vishnu S/o Baburao Sarode
Vishnu S/o Bhaulal Chumbalkar
U.D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court