The High Court disposed of a criminal application filed by applicants challenging an FIR alleging assault and robbery. The court rejected the application noting the FIR was a false complaint filed with malafide intentions to take revenge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 843.2011 Cri.Appln.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 843 OF 2011
(Ravindra Daynoba Salunke & ors Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. )
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri N.B. Jadhav, Advocate for applicants-absent Shri S.N. Kendre, A.P.P. for respondent No.1/ State
CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J. DATED : 28th March, 2012.
SDM*
2 843.2011 Cri.Appln.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to reject a false FIR filed with malafide intentions as a criminal application.
Ravindra Daynoba Salunke & ors
The State of Maharashtra
U.D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
