Petitioner sought to delete respondent names. Dispute with respondents settled via consent terms marked on record. Court disposed of the writ petition based on the consent minutes.
Leave granted to delete names of respondent Nos. 4 to 7; petition disposed of pursuant to consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.2309.2012
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2309 OF 2012
Rohit Vijay Madan ... Petitioner Vs. The Divisional Joint Registrar ... Respondents. Co-operative Societies, Division Nashik, & Ors.
Mr.N.N.Bhadrashete, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.Kishor Tembe, Advocate for the respondent Nos.1,2. Mr.R.M.Patne AGP for the respondent No.3.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE J. DATE : 25th APRIL, 2012.
P.C.
[ RANJIT MORE, J ]
Rohit Vijay Madan
The Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Division Nashik
Others
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
