The petitioner, without appearing in person or through counsel, failed to pursue writ petition no. 2102 of 1996. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and discharged the rule.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT F JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders.
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
906 WRIT PETITION NO. 2102 OF 1996
BHASKAR BAJIRAO SONAWANE. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS.
Advocate for respondent 5 : Mr. Y.B. Bolkar, h/f Mr. R.B. Raghuwanshi AGP for the State : Mr. P.P. More ...
CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. Dated: May 05, 2012 ... PER COURT :
( R.M. BORDE, J. )
dyb
BHASKAR BAJIRAO SONAWANE
STATE OF MAH.
OTHERS
R.M. BORDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
