Petitioner's writ petition challenging a bank communication was disposed as withdrawn by the Bank, which undertook to withdraw the communication with liberty for appropriate recovery steps.
Petition disposed as withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate steps for recovery of loan as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
wp1919.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION NO.1919 OF 2012
Dr.Nandu Dwarkadas Chhabria : Petitioner V/s. State Bank of India & Ors. : Respondents
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Prothonotary’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.Robin Jaisinghania i/b. Ms J. D'Silva for the petitioner. Mr.A.G.Damale with Mr.R.J.Singh for respondent nos.1 & 2.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 & 2.
communication dated 14.8.2012 issued by the Bank to the petitioner. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner has
1 of 2
krs
wp1919.12
submitted that the Bank undertakes to withdraw the impugned communication dated 14.8.2012 with liberty to take appropriate steps for recovery of loan, if any, in accordance with law.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
2 of 2
Dr. Nandu Dwarkadas Chhabria
State Bank of India
D.D. SINHA
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
