Disposed
Gajanan Tukaram Tambe v. Union Bank of India, through, Managing Director and Ors.
Bombay HCCAW/1221/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
caw1221.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1221 OF 2012
In WRIT PETITION NO.10079 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.Mateen Shaikh for the applicant. Ms Sumedha Sawant i/b. M.M.Amin for respondent nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA &
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the respondent no.4 is also duly served.
Perused the Civil Application. The Civil
krs
caw1221.12
application is allowed subject to payment of costs of Rs.2,500/- to be paid to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority, Mumbai, within a period of two weeks. The applicant is directed to submit
acknowledgment of payment of costs in the Registry of this Court. On submission thereof, the order dated 30.1.2012 shall stand recalled and the Writ Petition shall stand restored to the file of this Court.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
2 of 2
applicant
respondent nos.1 to 3
D.D. Sinha
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court