Dismissed
Baban Shankarrao Deshmukh v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/174/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 174.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 174 OF 2012
Baban Shankarrao Deshmukh .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri S. B. Gatol Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri G. R. Ingole (Patil), A.G.P. for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 10TH JANUARY, 2012.
PER COURT :
. Shri Ghatol, the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the nomination paper of the respondent No. 4 could not have been accepted. He is a member of joint family. There is no evidence of division of family. There is no decree of the Court in his favour to prove disruption of the joint family. The son of the respondent No. 4 is possessing valid traders license and his name is included in A Class Traders Constituency. The petitioner’s nomination should not have been accepted from agriculturist cooperative constituency. The learned counsel contends that even the certificate which has been produced on record by the
2 wp 174.12
petitioner to show that he is separate is after the date of filing the nomination paper.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Jan. 12
Baban Shankarrao Deshmukh
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court