The High Court Bench at Aurangabad dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the rejection of a Nimtana measurement application, holding that no measurement had occurred in the present suit and thus the issue did not arise.
Writ Petition dismissed, no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 W.P. 140.2012
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 140 OF 2012
Office Notes,Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram,appearances, ................................ Court's orders or CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. directions and Registrar's orders DATE : 09/01/2012.
Mr. V.D.Hon, Advocate for the Petitioner.
PER COURT :
2 W.P. 140.2012
effective adjudication, Nimtana measurement is necessary.
[ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/W.P. 140.2012
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition challenging the rejection of the Nimtana measurement application is maintainable.
Whether the absence of joint measurement in the present suit precludes the necessity of Nimtana measurement.
Petitioner
Respondent
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
