The petitioner sought withdrawal of WP-1663 of 2012 due to subsequent events extinguishing the cause of action. The court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn without adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chandka
WP-1663-12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 1663 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Ms. Pavitra Manesh i/b. M. S. Topkar for Petitioner.
Mr. S. R. Nargolkar – Additional Government Pleader for State.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. 22 March 2012
P.C. :
Counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the subsequent events the cause of action in the present petition no more survives. Hence, same is disposed of as withdrawn.
(D. D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
1/1
Ms. Pavitra Manesh i/b. M. S. Topkar
State
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
