compliance to this court within the extended period, appears to have chosen to move the State Government afresh. Now this petition has been filed for direction against the State Government to decide the said fresh regularization application filed on 5th July, 2012. The argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that, the petitioner was required to file fresh application on 5th July, 2012 because the earlier application filed by him was destroyed during the recent fire incident in Mantralaya on 21st June, 2012. This argument clearly overlooks that no liberty was given to the petitioner by the Apex Court to once again approach the Urban Development Department of the Government of Maharashtra with further regularization application. The Petitioner perhaps taking advantage of the fire incident has moved the Urban Development Department of Government of Maharashtra with application dated 5th July, 2012 for regularization of the structure which request has already been considered and that decision has been upheld right upto the Apex Court. This conduct of the petitioners can not be countenanced at all. As a matter of fact, the petitioners have committed contempt of the directions given by the Apex court on 11th May, 2012 of submitting compliance report before this court within two months from that date of having removed the unauthorized structure. That has not been done by the petitioner so far on the pretext that fresh regularization application is filed and is still pending. 3. We have no hesitation in taking a view that the petitioners have been illadvised to file fresh regularization application before Urban Development Department as there is no power to review the decision already taken by the Urban Development Department and more so no such liberty has been given to the
