The petitioner claimed unawareness of a pending Supreme Court case challenging a caste certificate. The court held that interference in a second writ petition was not necessary given this fact and disposed of the petition without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPL-2024/12
.. 1 ..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY .
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2024 OF 2012
NEELAM V. DOLAS
... Petitioner.
V/s.
THE CASTE SCRUTINY VERIFICATION COMMITTEE, MUMBAI SUBURBAN AND ANR.
... Respondents.
Mr A.A.Siddiqui i/b M/s A.A.Siddiqui & Associates for Petitioner.
Mr N.P.Pandit, AGP for Respondent No.1.
Mr C.K.Bhangoji for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR &
R.D.DHANUKA, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 13, 2012.
P.C.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not aware
about the fact that the correctness of the same caste validity certificate is subject matter of challenge in the proceeding before the Apex Court in SLP (Civil) No.21285 of 2012.
1/2
Asmita
.. 2 .. WPL-2024/12
does not arise.
(R.D.DHANUKA, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
2/2
Asmita
NEELAM V. DOLAS
THE CASTE SCRUTINY VERIFICATION COMMITTEE, MUMBAI SUBURBAN
ANR.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
R.D.DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
