The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of two connected writ petitions filed by drug companies. The court allowed the petitioners to withdraw the petitions while keeping the legal issues raised in them open for future proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27.wp.1585158612.doc
jdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1585 OF 2012
M/s. Kumud Drugs Pvt. Ltd.
..Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Anr.
..Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1586 OF 2012
M/s. Konduskar Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents
Mr. D.D. Tiwari for petitioners
Mr. A.B.Vagyani AGP for the Respondent No.1
Mr. Francis E. Saldanha Senior Standing Counsel with Vibhavari Y. Pathak Junior Standing Counsel for Sangli and Kolhapur Central Excise
CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J.
DATE : MARCH 19, 2012.
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners. The learned
1 of 2
27.wp.1585158612.doc
the Petitions may be kept open. In the circumstances, both the Writ Petitions are disposed of as withdrawn by keeping the issues open.
[ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ D.D.SINHA, J. ]
kandarkar
2 of 2
M/s. Kumud Drugs Pvt. Ltd.
M/s. Konduskar Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
D.D. Sinha
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
