The petitioner sought protection under Article 21 relying on a previous decision. On hearing that the earlier Writ Petition No. 4561 of 2010 had already been disposed of by this Court, the present petition was held not maintainable and was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sk
wp4931.11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.4931 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.R.S.Apte, Senior Advocate, with Mr.G.M.Savagave for the petitioner. Mr.V.S.Gokhale, A.G.P. for respondent no.1.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : MARCH 16, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the respondent no.1.
1 of 2
sk
wp4931.11
this Court rendered in Voltas and Others v. Additional Collector & Competent Authority (2008 (5) Bom.C.R.746), the said petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 21.7.2010. Hence, the present petition is not maintainable and the same is, therefore, disposed of as not maintainable.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
2 of 2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Voltas and Others v. Additional Collector & Competent AuthorityReferred¶12
(2008 (5) Bom.C.R.746) · Who else cites this
Petitioner
Respondent no.1
D.D. SINHA
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
