This writ petition was disposed of because the respondent stated the suit was withdrawn and the matter was compromised, while the petitioner failed to respond.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP1455-12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1455/2012
(RAMESH G. CHAUDHARI VERSUS ARJUN P. NARKHEDE & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri S.G. Joshi, counsel for the petitioner. Shri G.G. Mishra, counsel for the R-4.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2012.
Shri Mishra, the learned counsel for the respondent no.4, states on instructions from the local counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.4, that the matter is compromised between the parties and the suit has been withdrawn.
Since a similar statement was made on the last date of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner had sought time to verify the aforesaid position. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, states that the petitioner is not responding.
In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondent no.4, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
APTE
Ramesh G. Chaudhari
Arjun P. Narkhede
Vasanti A. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
