Petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the writ petition had become infructuous due to subsequent developments. The Court disposed of the petition with no order as to costs.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp86-12.order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No.86 of 2012
Sunil Sitaram Aghadate
Vs.
Additional Collector, Akola and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr. S.D. Chopde, learned counsel for the petitioner.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : 13th December, 2012.
Shri Chopde, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments.
In view of the statement made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
Hirekhan
Sunil Sitaram Aghadate
Additional Collector, Akola
Vasanti A. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
