In a writ petition, the court directed the respondent to decide petitioners' representations within three months.
Direction to respondent no.2 to decide the representations within three months as expeditiously as possible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1321 OF 2012
Tushar Anandrao Jagtap & ors ..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr V.P. Golewar, Advocate for the petitioners; Mr K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent no.1
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 10th February, 2012
PER COURT :
The limited relief claimed in the present petition is for a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the representations dated 8.12.2011, 23.12.2011 and 1.1.2012 of the petitioners at Exhibit F, within a stipulated period.
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
amj/wp1321.12
Tushar Anandrao Jagtap
The State of Mah.
B.R. GAVAI
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
