The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Appellate Side, Bench at Aurangabad, disposed of Civil Applications Nos. 1389 and 1390 of 2012, which arose out of Writ Petition No. 6379 of 2011, by allowing interventions and disposing of the applications without further reasoning.
Interventions allowed; applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 1389 AND 1390 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.6379 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
and the Registrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Coram: B.R.Gavai & Sunil P. Deshmukh, JJ
Date : 10th February 2012
Shri U.B. Bilolikar and Shri Suraj V. Gundre,
Advocate for applicants in C.A. Nos. 1389/12
and 1390/12 respectively.
Shri M.B.Sandanshiv Adv. for Respondent No.1.
Smt.A.V.Gondhalekar, AGP for Resp.Nos.2 to 4.
Shri Rahul Awsarmal,Adv.for Respondent No. 5.
Shri K.A. Khule, Adv. for Respondent No. 6.
1.Interventions allowed. Both the
applications stand disposed of, accordingly.
(Sunil P. Deshmukh, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.)
pnd/ca-1389.12
B.R. Gavai
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court