Petitioner withdrew a writ petition concerning recruitment, seeking liberty to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The single bench allowed the withdrawal.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to pursue remedy before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
121012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
vgm
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1210 OF 2012
Kishor S/o. Pralhad Chaudhari ...Petitioner V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Ganesh Vaidya I/by Mr. Hemant Kumar Pawar for the Petitioner
Mr. Samir Patil, A.G.P., for the Respondents
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND
N.M. JAMDAR, JJ. DATE: MARCH 07, 2012
P.C .:-
Preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this petition is raised by the learned A.G.P. According to him, Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 expressly invests jurisdiction in the Administrative Tribunal of a State to deal with matters in relation to
recruitment and matters concerning recruitment to the State service.
N.M. JAMDAR, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Kishor S/o. Pralhad Chaudhari
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
A.M. KHANWILKAR
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
