High Court disposed of W.P. No. 1043 of 2012 after the University satisfied the Court that nothing required adjudication following their reply-affidavit submission.
Petition disposed of by accepting University's plea; respondents to take follow-up action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
104312
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
vgm CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1043 OF 2012
Jaykumar Vitthalbhai Dadhaniya ...Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. S.M. Railkar for the Petitioner
Mr. C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P., for Respondent No. 1
Mr. Rui Rodrigues for Respondent No. 2
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND N.M. JAMDAR, JJ. DATE: MARCH 07, 2012
P.C .:-
In view of the stand taken by the counsel for the University in the reply-affidavit, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. Hence, this petition is disposed of upon accepting the plea of the University. The respondents to take follow-up action in accordance with law.
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Jaykumar Vitthalbhai Dadhaniya
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
