Petitioner's writ petition challenging non-appointment as Assistant Loco Pilot was allowed to be withdrawn. The court permitted withdrawal citing the exercise was completed in 2010 and petitioner can apply afresh upon fresh advertisement.
Writ petition disposed of as; permission granted to withdraw petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-117-12
Chandka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 117 OF 2012
Gaurav Prakash Sabnis versus
Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
..Petitioner
..Respondents
Mr. Suresh M. Sabrad for Petitioner. Ms. Kiran Bagalia for Respondents.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
20 March 2012
P.C. :
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
1/2
WP-117-12
Chandka
Right to Information Act in this regard which shows that as per the screening committee report, the petitioner failed to submit no objection certificate from the joint land owner. The petitioner made an application for appointment on the said post from the project affected category.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to admit a writ petition directing appointment against a customs of non-appointment for the post of Assistant Loco Pilot.
Gaurav Prakash Sabnis
Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd.
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
