In a criminal writ petition concerning property claims over a plot, this court set aside the proceeding on the directions for the police to act on the petitioner's application without discussing merits. It reserved all other prayers.
Directing the Superintendent of Police to pass orders on the petitioner's application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri.W.P. 116 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Writ Petition No. 116 of 2012
Anil S/o Dattu Patil .. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri. V.D. Rakh, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE 7th MARCH 2012
PER COURT :
2 Cri.W.P. 116 of 2012
settled, the police recorded statement of Lata Tayade and also the parties have entered into an agreement on stamp papers on 26-12-2011.
Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding property claims deserves merits-based adjudication given the settlement claim.
Anil S/o Dattu Patil
The State of Maharashtra & Others
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
