Disposed
Banobi Shaikh Akbar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1132/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cwp1132.10
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1132 OF 2010
(Banobi w/o Shaikh Akbar vs. The State of Mah. & Others)
OfficeNotes, |
Office |
Court’s or Judge’s Orders |
|---|---|---|
Memorandaof |
Coram, |
|
appearances, |
Court’s |
|
orders or directi |
ons and |
|
Registrar’s orders |
. |
Shri.Shaikh Ashpak Taher Patel Advocate
for Petitioner.
Smt.V.A. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondents.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE : 6TH MARCH, 2012.
1. Heard. The learned counsel for
the Petitioner undertakes to file second
set of the Petition.
2. The learned A.P.P., on instructions,
submits that charge-sheet has already
been filed.
3. The Petitioner is entitled to
resort to alternate statutory remedies as
permissible in law. In the light of the
cwp1132.10
2
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
statement made by the learned A.P.P., the
Writ Petition is disposed of.
[T.V. NALAWADE,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/MAR12
Banobi w/o Shaikh Akbar
The State of Mah.
Others
NARESH H. PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court