Writ petition under Art. 226 is disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioners with liberty to approach appropriate authority for redressal. No substantive legal proposition is involved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.wp-1119-12.doc
jdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1119 OF 2012
Pravin Ratansi Vikmani and Ors.
..Petitioners
Vs.
The Ambernath Municipal Council Taluka Ambernath and Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. S.A.Sawant with Sandeep Bane and Vijay Kamble i/b M/s. B.K.Barve and Co. for Petitioners Mr. B.D.Joshi for Respondent No.1
Ms. Gauri Godse for Respondent No. 2
CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J. DATE : FEBRUARY 24, 2012.
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 and the learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to approach appropriate authority for redressal of their grievance if available in law. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
[ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ D.D.SINHA, J. ]
kandarkar
1 of 1
Pravin Ratansi Vikmani and Ors.
The Ambernath Municipal Council
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
