The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition praying a direction to decide a pending representation regarding lapse of land reservation. It directed the respondent to decide the matter within eight weeks.
Direction to decide the representation within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-1354-12
Chandka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1354 OF 2012
M/s. Shah Promoters and Developers
..Petitioner
versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. R. S. Kohli for Petitioner.
Mr. S. R. Nargolkar – Additional Government Pleader for State.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
23 February 2012
P.C. :
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the State.
1/2
WP-1354-12
Chandka
Section 127(2) of the MRTP Act, which is pending for decision and therefore prayed that the direction be given to the respondent no. 1 to decide the same within a stipulated period.
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent authority was directed to decide the petitioner’s representation under Section 127(2) of the MRTP Act within a specified time limit.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Shah Promoters and Developers
State of Maharashtra
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
