Pavita Gokul Kale v. Kanifnath Eknath Dhere and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
None present for Petitioner. The Court dismissed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1093 of 2011 for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cwp1093.11
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1093 OF 2011
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
None present for the Petitioner.
Smt.V.A. Shinde, A.P.P. for Resp. Nos. 8
to 10.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE : 16TH MARCH, 2012.
1. The Advocate for the Petitioner
was absent on last occasion. Even today
also none appears for the Petitioner. The
Writ Petition is dismissed for non
prosecution.
[T.V. NALAWADE,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/MAR12
unnamed Petitioner
Resp. Nos. 8 to 10
NARESH H. PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court