The High Court at Aurangabad, in Criminal Application No.1162 of 2012 in Criminal Appeal ST. No.162 of 2012, heard the application. The court perused the record and held that the delay in filing the appeal was condoned with reasons stated in the application.
Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra1162.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1162 OF 2012 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. NO.162 OF 2012
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Shri.S.D. Kaldate, A.P.P. for Respondent.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE : 16TH MARCH, 2012.
1. Heard the learned A.P.P. Perused
the record. For the reasons stated in the
Application, delay is filing the Appeal
is condoned.
[T.V. NALAWADE,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/MAR12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Respondent
NARESH H. PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court