Ghevarchand G. Jain v. Prakash Jadhav and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The plaintiff and their advocate were absent in a summary suit. The court dismissed the summons for judgment by default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 292 OF 2010 IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2779 OF 2009
Ghevarchand G. Jain
... Plaintiff
Versus
Prakash Jadhav and anr.
... Defendants
None for plaintiff.
Ms. Nidhi Singh i/by M/s. India Law Alliance for Defendant no. 2.
CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATED : JUNE 21, 2012.
P.C.
This matter appeared on board on 9th December, 2011. Neither plaintiff nor advocate was present. The matter then appeared on 19th June, 2012. None appeared for the plaintiff. The matter was therefore, adjourned to 21st June, 2012 for dismissal. Plaintiff as well as advocate is absent. Hence, summons for judgment is dismissed for default.
R.D. Dhankha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court