Disposed
State Bank of India v. Shalyendra Kumar Saxena and Anr.
Bombay HCCHS/194/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 194 OF 2012 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2696 OF 2003
State Bank of India
... Plaintiff
Versus
Shalyendra Kumar Saxena and anr. ... Defendants
Mr., Vivek S. Sawant i/by Kusumakar Kaushik for plaintiff.
None for Defendants.
CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATED : JUNE 21, 2012.
P.C.
The Plaintiff has taken out this chamber summons for seeking permission to serve writ of summons on defendant no. 1 at the address given in the cause title by various modes. I have gone through the affidavit
in support. For the reasons given in affidavit in support, chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court