Appellant moved for a clerical correction to the Gut number recorded in an earlier order dated 21/06/2012, substituting G.No. 298 with G.No. 296.
Order dated 21/06/2012 amended to read G.No. 296 instead of G.No. 298 in specified lines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 S.A. 349.2011
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL NO. 349 OF 2011
Narmadabai W/o Bajirao Naik V/s Rukhmabai W/o Vithal Naik & Ors.
Office Notes,Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram,appearances, ................................ Court's orders or CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. directions and Registrar's orders DATE : 08/08/2012.
Mr. H.V.Patil, Advocate for the Appellant.
PER COURT :
In line no. 2 of para no. 3 and in line no. 3 of para no. 5 of Order dated 21/06/2012, G.No. 298 shall be corrected and read as G.No. 296.
2 S.A. 349.2011
[ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ]
KNP/S.A. 349.2011
Narmadabai W/o Bajirao Naik
Rukhmabai W/o Vithal Naik & Ors.
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
