Appellant applied for leave to withdraw the Second Appeal filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Appellate Side, Bench at Aurangabad. The respondent had no objection. The court disposed of the appeal as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL NO.254 OF 2012 WITH C.A.NO.4703 OF 2012.
Mangal Bhausaheb Pandav and another Vs. Vikram S/o Vithoba
Badade and others.
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
andRegistrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.C.V.Dharurkar, advocate for the appellants.
Mr.B.R.Sable, advocate for the REspondents.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.
Date : 21.06.2012.
PER COURT :
2
withdrawn. No costs.
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.21.06.2012. asp/office/Sa254.12
Mangal Bhausaheb Pandav
Vikram S/o Vithoba Badade
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court