Bhojraj Sitaram Meshram v. Anandabai Roshanlal Mankar and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sa2.12.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Second Appeal No. 2/2012
Bhojraj Sitaram Meshram ..vs.. Anandabai Roshanlal Mankar & anr.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. A. K. Ankar, Advocate for appellant Mrs. D. I. Charlewar, Advocate for respondents.
CORAM : M.N. GILANI, J . DATED : JULY 20, 2012.
- The appellant in this second appeal was the original defendant in Regular Civil Suit No. 10/1998 filed by two sisters namely; Smt. Anandabai and Smt. Prabhawatibai for declaration and possession of the properties left by their deceased father Asaram, who died on 10.09.1989. The defendant Bhojraj (appellant herein) was nephew of deceased Asaram. He resisted the suit mainly on two grounds. Firstly, on the point that on 07.05.1972, he was adopted by deceased Asaram and after his death, property devolved upon him, being the sole surviving son. Secondly, he claimed ownership on the basis of Will deed allegedly executed by Asaram on 11.02.1987 in respect of the suit property except the land bearing Gat No. 90 admeasuring 20 R. The learned trial Court, after appreciating the evidence, held that the defendant was not an adopted son of Asaram. However, held that the Will was rightly executed sans suit property Gat No.90 admeasuring 20 R. Therefore, the suit was decreed only for the land Gat No.90 admeasuring 20 R.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bhojraj Sitaram Meshram
- respondent
Anandabai Roshanlal Mankar
Coram
M.N. Gilani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sau. Jayabai W/O Purushottam Kadu, Legal Representative of Smt. Zingubai Wd/O Govindrao Gomashe Vs Smt. Shewantabai W/O Balaji Pangul
Abdul Rahman S/O Abdul Mallik Lallani Vs Maroti S/O Botya Muppidwar and 4 Ors.
Namdeo S/O. Pandurang Khedkar. Vs Shahi Gupta Masjid Trust, through Abdul Subban S/O Ramjan Bax Siddhiqui and Another
Smt. Nirmala Wd/O Dnyaneshwar Bhagat and 3 Others Vs Smt. Satyabhama Wd/O Narayan Thool and 3 Others