Allowed

Mukesh Deodatta Gupta and 4 Others v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secy Deptt of Home Affairs and 3 Others

Bombay HC3 Oct 2012REVN/49/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Nagpur allowed the withdrawal of Criminal Revision Application No. 49/2012 after the parties decided to refer their dispute to an arbitrator, vacating any interim order.

What did the court decide?

The petition is allowed to be withdrawn; interim order, if any, stands vacated; application disposed of.

What the court decided

Mukesh Deodatta Gupta and 4 Others Vs State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

1/2

¶2

03.10.revn.49.12

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO................./2012 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 49/2012

¶6

(Shri Mukesh Deodatta Gupta and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and others )

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

Shri A G.Gharote, Adv. for applicants Shri J B Jaiswal, APP for respondent nos.1 to 3

¶9

CORAM : M.L. TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : 3^rd October, 2012.

¶10

Heard.

¶11

This Application is submitted in the Court for withdrawal of Criminal Revision Application No.49/2012. The dispute between the parties has been decided to be referred to an Arbitrator. The applicants have, therefore, decided to withdraw the present Revision Application so that the arbitration proceedings can take place in a smooth and congenial atmosphere.

¶12

Mr. J.B. Jaiswal, learned APP has submitted that this Court may pass an appropriate order in view of development which have taken place after filing of the Application.

¶13

Since the dispute between the parties has been

¶14

2/2

¶15

03.10.revn.49.12

¶16

decided to be referred to an Arbitrator, it is just and proper that this Revision is allowed to be withdrawn Cri. Revision No.49/2012 is allowed to be withdrawn. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. The present Application accordingly stands disposed of.

¶17

The present Application be registered and shown disposed of accordingly.

¶18

JUDGE

¶19

sahare

Mukesh Deodatta Gupta and 4 Others v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secy Deptt of Home Affairs and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Mukesh Deodatta Gupta and 4 Others v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secy Deptt of Home Affairs and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Agri. Dev. and Social Welfare Pro. Thr. Power of Attorney Ronalrao Padmanabhan Rao and One Vs Judicial Magistrate First Class and Others

Shrikant @ Balya S/O Laxman Uike Vs State of Maharashtra through Pso Pratapnagar, Police Station Nagpur

The Agri. Dev. and Social Welfare Pro. Thr. Power of Attorney Ronalrao Padmanabhan Rao and One Vs Judicial Magistrate First Class and Others

Mukesh S/O Deodatta Gupta and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary and Others

Mukesh S/O Deodatta Gupta and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary and Others

Smt Afsara Bano W/O Mohd Ashraf Kariya and Another Vs State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Nagbhid and Another