Court permitted withdrawal of Public Interest Litigation No. 13 of 2012 with liberty to file a fresh PIL at the appropriate stage, granting it without prejudice.
Permission granted to withdraw the PIL with liberty to file a fresh PIL at the appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skc
PIL-13-12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 13 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Mr. V. S. Deokar - Petitioner - in- person. Mr. A. B. Vagyani - Assistant Government Pleader for State – Respondent No. 1. Mr. B. A. Walimbe for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND
SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. 03 February 2012
P.C. :
Heard the petitioner-in-person.
The petitioner-in-person seeks
permission to withdraw the PIL at this stage with liberty to approach this Court by filing fresh PIL at the appropriate stage. Permission granted.
PIL is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. This liberty is granted without prejudice to the rights of the parties.
(D. D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Public Interest Litigation No. 13 of 2012
State
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
