Single-line order dismissing the application by default for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear. No substantive legal analysis is provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17.01.12.mca767.11.odt
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
MCA NO.767/2011 IN WP NO.2345/2011 (D)
[Aakansha Pralhad Sidam .vrs. Maharashtra State Council of Examination, Pune
and others]
..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND
P.D. KODE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 17, 2012.
None for applicant/petitioner even on second call. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE JUDGE
Gulande
Aakansha Pralhad Sidam
Maharashtra State Council of Examination
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
P.D. KODE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
