The Court corrected an order dated 9.1.2012 to read a period of 10 weeks as 10 months as dictated by the Court, and disposed of the contingent application.
Correction of order dated 9.1.2012 to read 10 weeks as 10 months; CA disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16.01.12.caw75.12.odt
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CAW NO.75/2012 IN WP NO.2127/2010 (D)
[Mushtaq Ashmad Qureshi s/o Abdul Rehaman Qureshi and others .vrs. Amravati Municipal Corporation and others]
..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri M.K. Pathan, Advocate for respondent no.1, Shri T.R. Kankale, AGP for respondent no.2.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P.D. KODE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 16, 2012.
It is apparent that period of 10 months dictated by this court has been transcribed as 10 weeks. Hence, order dated 9.1.2012 is corrected accordingly and period of 10 weeks therein be read as 10 months.
CA stands disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
Gulande
Mushtaq Ashmad Qureshi s/o Abdul Rehaman Qureshi and others
Amravati Municipal Corporation and others
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
P.D. KODE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
