IN THE HIGH COURT
Condonation of delay; restoration of writ petition; leave granted in terms of prayer clause (i).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cao.517.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Civil Application [CAO] No. 517 of 2012
and
Civil Application [MCA] St.No. 8633 of 2012
and
Civil Application [CAW] No. 1499 of 2012
in
Writ Petition No. 590 of 2007
(Madhav Dhansingh Rathod
vs.
The Washim Urban Cooperative Bank and another)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearances, Courts orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. H.D. Dubey, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. S.J. Khandalkar, Advocate for the respondents.
Civil Application [CAO] No. 517 of 2012 :-
For the reasons stated in the application
and since the learned Counsel for respondents
Mr. Khandalkar has no objection to condone the
delay, the delay of 810 days is condoned. The
application is allowed and disposed of
accordingly.
Civil Application [MCA] St. No. 8633 of 2012 :-
For the reasons stated in the application,
the application is allowed and writ petition no.
590/2007 is restored to file. The application is
disposed of accordingly.
2 cao.517.12
Civil Application [CAW] No. 1499 of 2012 :-
For the reasons stated in the application,
leave is granted in terms of prayer clause (i).
The application is allowed and disposed of as
such.
JUDGE
*sdw
Madhav Dhansingh Rathod
The Washim Urban Cooperative Bank
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court