Disposed
Shri Suvarn Rajaram Bandekar v. Mr. Armando Cardozo
Bombay HCLPA/2/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA LETTER PATENT APPEAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 606 OF 2011
SHRI SUVARN RAJARAM BANDEKAR Versus MR. ARMANDO CARDOZO
... Appellant
... Respondent
Mr. J. E. Ceolho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vledson Braganza, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Nigel D'Costa Frias, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. V. Rodrigues, Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.2 to 4.
Coram:S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & U. V. BAKRE, JJ.
Date:5th March, 2012
P.C.
Mr. J. E. Coelho Pereira, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant states that he has instructions to apply for withdrawal of Letters Patel Appeal in view of subsequent developments.
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
SMA
SHRI SUVARN RAJARAM BANDEKAR
MR. ARMANDO CARDOZO
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court