In view of the order passed in PIL WP No. 13 of 2011, the present civil application (2011) does not survive and is disposed of without further discussion or substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 165 OF 2011
IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION WP NO. 13 OF 2011
THE FABRICA DE IGREJA DE ORLIM THROUGH ITS ATTORNEY MR. FRANCISCO RODRIGUES AND 6 ORS., Versus STATE OF GOA, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS.,
... Applicants
... Respondents
Mr. N. Costa Frias, Advocate for the applicants..
Mr. M. Salkar, Government Advocate for respondent nos.1, 3,4, 5, 8 and 10.
Mr. D. Vernekar, Advocate for respondent no.2.
Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for respondent nos. 6 and 7.
Mr. J. Godinho, Advocate for respondent no.9.
Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for the respondent no.11.
Coram:S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & U. V. BAKRE, JJ.
Date:1st March, 2012
P.C.
In view or order passed in PILWP No.13/2011, this application does not survive and is disposed of.
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
vn
The Fabrica de Igreja de Orlim Through its Attorney Mr. Francisco Rodrigues and 6 Ors.
State of Goa Through Chief Secretary and Ors.
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
