Appeal against a Single Judge's order remanding a matter to the Collector. The High Court was satisfied that the appeal was academic as there would be ample opportunity to present the case on merits.
Appeal dismissed with clarification that no opinion is expressed on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Mlns
LPAW182-12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 182 OF 2012
IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1508 OF 2012 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO.347 OF 2012
(For Stay)
Mohan Tukaram Suryawanshi. … Appellant Vs.
Tanaji Babaso Patil & Ors. … Respondents
Mr.Akshay P. Shinde, for appellant.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. &
N.M. JAMDAR J.
Monday, September 24, 2012.
P.C.:
Since all that the learned Single Judge has done by impugned order is to remand the matter to the Collector after setting aside the impugned order of disqualification and the parties will have ample opportunity to present their case before the Collector on merits, we see no reason to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge under appeal.
CHIEF JUSTICE
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
Mohan Tukaram Suryawanshi
Tanaji Babaso Patil & Ors.
MOHIT S. SHAH
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
