Disposed

Mrs. Anasuya Sricrishna Kenkre Alias Anasuya Sheila Kenkre and 2 Ors., v. Mr. Umakant Bhalchandra Kenkre (Deceased) and 15 Ors.

Bombay HC17 Sept 2012FA/192/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court disposed of two first appeals after the parties amicably settled their disputes and executed consent terms, which were accepted by the court for finalizing the case.

What did the court decide?

Appeals disposed of in terms of consent terms; interim reliefs vacated; no order as to costs.

What the court decided

Mrs. Anasuya Sricrishna Kenkre Alias Anasuya Sheila Kenkre and 2 Ors., Vs Mr. Umakant Bhalchandra Kenkre (Deceased) and 15 Ors. — Bombay HC (2012) — LawSathi Research

¶1

:1:

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

¶3

FIRST APPEAL NOS. 192 & 252 OF 2009

¶4

FIRST APPEAL NOS. 192 OF 2009

¶5

Mrs. Anasuya Sricrishna Kenkre alias Anasuya Sheila Kenkre and 2 Ors. … Appellants

¶6

V e r s u s

¶7

Mr. Umakant Bhalchandra Kenkre (Deceased ) and 15 Ors. … Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

FIRST APPEAL NOS. 252 OF 2009

¶10

Dr. Sricrishna Balchandra Kenkre ( Deceased ) through Lr's and Anr.

¶11

… Appellants

¶12

V e r s u s

¶13

Mr. Umakant Balchandra Kenkre ( Deceased ) through Lr's and 4 Ors. … Respondents

¶14

Mr. P. S. Lotlikar, Advocate for the appellants.

¶15

Mr. J. E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Ms. R. Kantak, Advocate for the respondent nos. 2 to 5.

¶16

CORAM : F. M. REIS &

¶17

U. V. BAKRE,JJ.

¶18

DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER, 2012.

¶19

P.C. :

¶20

Heard Shri P. S. Lotlikar, learned Counsel

¶21

:2:

¶22

appearing for the appellants and Shri J. E. Coelho Pereira, learned Senior Counsel along with Ms. R. Kantak, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 2 to 5.

¶23

At the outset, Shri Lotlikar, learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks leave to delete the respondent nos. 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15 and 16 in First Appeal No. 192 of 2009. Leave granted. The respondent nos. 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15 and 16 in First Appeal No. 192 of 2009 stand deleted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

¶24

After hearing the matter for some time on earlier occasion, the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties sought time to explore the possibility of settling the disputes between them amicably. Hence, after taking some opportunities, the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties along with the parties to the above appeals who are present in Court pointed out that they have amicably settled the disputes in the above appeals and have executed the consent terms duly signed by all the parties. The consent terms along with the copy of Deed of Settlement- Cum -Allotment dated 17.09.2012 and the

¶25

:3:

¶26

power of attorney are taken on record and marked 'X' Colly for identification. The parties and their respective counsels have admitted the contents of the consent terms and pointed out that they have voluntarily settled all the disputes between them in terms of the consent terms. The learned Counsels thereafter pointed out that the above appeals be disposed of in terms of the consent terms.

¶27

Considering the above contentions of the learned

¶28

counsel, we find no reason to refuse to accept the said consent terms and dispose of the above appeals accordingly.

¶29

In view of the above, we pass the following :

¶30

O R D E R

¶31

(i) Both the above appeals stand disposed of in terms of the consent terms marked 'X' Colly for identification.

¶32

(ii) All interim reliefs stand vacated.

¶33

:4:

¶34

(iii) Both the appeals stand disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

¶35

(iv) Decree to be drawn accordingly.

¶36

F. M. REIS, J

¶37

U. V. BAKRE,J

¶38

at*

Mrs. Anasuya Sricrishna Kenkre Alias Anasuya Sheila Kenkre and 2 Ors., v. Mr. Umakant Bhalchandra Kenkre (Deceased) and 15 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Mrs. Anasuya Sricrishna Kenkre Alias Anasuya Sheila Kenkre and 2 Ors., v. Mr. Umakant Bhalchandra Kenkre (Deceased) and 15 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Shaikh Vahidulla, Panaji Goa. Vs Shri Ranjit Satardekar and Anr.

Mr. Melwyn Fernandes Vs State of Goa through Its Chief Secretary and 4 Ors.

Prabhakar H. Parab Vs Union of India and 4 Ors.

Mrs. Vanashree Fatu Kenkre and 2 Ors., Vs Dr. Sricrishna Balchandre Kenkre (Deceased) through Lr'S and Ors.

Dr. Sricrishna Balchandre Kenkre (Deceased) through Lr'S and Anr. Vs Mr. Umakant Balchandra Kenkre (Deceased) through Lr'S and 4 Ors.

M/S. Teracom Ltd. Rep. by Its Chief Operating Officer Mr. Ashish D. Jain Vs M/S. Sojitz Corporation Rep. by Mr. Masahiro Ota