In a one-line order, this High Court allowed the criminal miscellaneous application and disposed of the matter without further reasoning.
Criminal miscellaneous application allowed and made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 258 OF 2012
IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 80 OF 2012
ARUN KUMAR DAMA ... Applicant Versus SHRI UJJWAL YOGIRAJ SAKHAREMAHARAJ ... Respondent
Mr. Nitin Sardesai, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Mahesh Amonkar, Advocate for the respondent.
Coram:S. J. VAZIFDAR & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:8th October, 2012
P.C.:-
There is no objection to the criminal misc. application being allowed.
S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
ssm.
ARUN KUMAR DAMA
SHRI UJJWAL YOGIRAJ SAKHAREMAHARAJ
S. J. VAZIFDAR
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
