This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 322 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 739 OF 2010
... Applicant
ADV. AIRES RODRIGUES ... Applicant Versus GOA CRICKET ASSOCIATION, REP. BY SHRI PRASAD PHATERPEKAR, GENERAL SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Respondents
Applicant in Person. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Mr. D. Lawande, Government Advocate for respondents no.3 and 4. Mr. M.S. Sonak with Mr. J. Supekar, Advocates for the original petitioners.
Coram:S. J. VAZIFDAR & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:8th October, 2012
P.C:
If the petitioner requires any document in the course of the trial of the suit filed against him, it is always open for him to seek production of the document in the suit. There is no reason for this court to grant early hearing on the ground that the document is required in the suit filed by the petitioner. Hence, the application is dismissed.
S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
ap/-
GOA CRICKET ASSOCIATION, REP. BY SHRI PRASAD PHATERPEKAR, GENERAL SECRETARY AND ANR.
S. J. VAZIFDAR
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
