The High Court of Bombay disposed of a company petition based on consent terms signed by authorized representatives of both parties to settle arbitration cost-sharing equally.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP 282 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICTURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.282 OF 2011
Shyam Narayan and Bros. .....Petitioner Versus Kajiva Construction Company Private Ltd. …..Respondent
Mr.M.M.Shetty, for Petitioner.
Mr.Ravindra V. Sankpal, for Respondent.
CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 9 th AUGUST 2012
P.C. :
1/2
ssp
CP 282 of 2011
borne by both the parties equally.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
2/2
ssp
Shyam Narayan and Bros.
Kajiva Construction Company Private Ltd.
S.J.KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
