In an arbitration petition, the court recorded consent terms signed by authorized representatives of the parties. The Arbitration Petition was disposed of in terms of these consent terms.
The Arbitration Petition was disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms signed by the authorized representatives of the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ARBP 631 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICTURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.631 OF 2012
Cipla Ltd. and Anr. .....Petitioners Versus Avesthagen Ltd. …..Respondent
Mr.Soli Cooper, Senior Advocate with Ms.Ethel Pereira, Ms.Sadaf Shaikh, Mr.Shailesh Poria i/by M/s.Hariani and Co., for Petitioners. Mr.Aditya Jalan i/by M/s.ALMT Legal, for Respondent.
CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE: 9 th AUGUST 2012
P.C. :
tendered Consent Terms dated 09-08-2012. They submit that the Consent Terms be taken on record and the Arbitration Petition be disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and
marked ‘X’ for identification. The Consent Terms are signed by the authorized representative of Petitioner No.1, Director of Petitioner No.2, Director of the Respondent and the Advocates for the Parties. The undertakings given in the Consent Terms are accepted.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
ssp
Cipla Ltd. and Anr.
Avesthagen Ltd.
S.J.KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
