Contempt petition filed for non-compliance of an order directing expeditious investigation was disposed of when the AGP stated the investigation was completed and report filed.
Contempt petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 228 OF 2012 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 77 OF 2011 IN
P.I.L. NO. 59 OF 2008
Alim Abu Baker Chagla .. Petitioner
Vs
State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
None for the Petitioner
Mr. N.P. Deshpande, AGP for the Respondents
CORAM : D. D. SINHA &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 22nd AUGUST, 2012.
P.C.:
has brought to our notice order dated 22.12.2011 passed by this Court in P.I.L. No. 59 of 2008 . Paragraph 4 of the same reads
thus:-
Pg 1 of 2
Range shall also record the statement of the applicant as expeditiously as possible and within 15 days from today."
Learned AGP states that the investigation has been completed and report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has already been filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class. In view of categorical statement made by the learned AGP, the Contempt Petition is disposed of.
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ]
[ D. D. SINHA, J ]z
jfoanz vkacsjdj
Pg 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Alim Abu Baker Chagla
State of Maharashtra
D. D. SINHA
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
