Application for condonation of delay in filing appeals was entertained. Court condensed the delay despite respondent's plea of infructuousness, leaving that question for merits.
Delay in filing appeals is condoned; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 46 OF 2012
IN
STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 1857 OF 2012
M/S.TERACOM LTD., THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND AUTHORIZED REP. HARSHWARDHAN PAGAY Versus M/S. SOJITZ CORPORATION, REP. BY MR. MASAHIRO OTA,
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashish Bernard and Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocates for the applicant. Mr. Ravi Kadam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhruv Dewan and Mr. D. Patkar, Advocates for the respondent.
Coram:F. M. REIS & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:24th August, 2012
P.C.
Heard Shri A. N. S. Nadkarni, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant and Shri Ravi Kadam, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent.
infructuous. It is further pointed out that as the appeal itself has become infructuous, the question of condoning the delay would not arise.
F. M. REIS, J.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
at*
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay in preferring appeals despite explanation is permissible where respondent contends appeal is infructuous.
Whether the decision on condonation of delay survives the objection that the underlying appeal has become infructuous.
M/S. TERACOM LTD.
M/S. SOJITZ CORPORATION
F. M. REIS
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
