Allowed

Sujata G. Cheulkar and Anr- Applicant and A.R. Choudhary and 10 Ors. v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Ors.

Bombay HC26 Sept 2012CHSW/172/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chamber Summonses were filed by various individuals seeking intervention in Writ Petition No.314 of 2012 concerning property allocations to the MIDC. The High Court allowed the summonses based on the respondents' proposal to use specified Gala Nos. where intervenors claimed entitlement.

What did the court decide?

Chamber Summonses for intervention in W.P. No.314 of 2012 were allowed and cases stood disposed.

Sujata G. Cheulkar and Anr- Applicant and A.R. Choudhary… — Landlord and Tenant | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

CHSW172&group_12.sxw

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.170 OF 2012 IN W.P.314 OF 2012

¶4

Karamshi R. Patel and another In the matter between	…	Applicants
A. R. Choudhary and others	…	Petitioners
Vs.
Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and others	…	Respondents
WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.171 OF 2012 IN	W.P.	314 OF 2012
Narashi Raja Patel	…	Applicant
In the matter between
A. R. Choudhary and others	…	Petitioners
Vs.
Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and others	…	Respondents
WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.172 OF 2012 IN	W.P.	314 OF 2012
Sujata Gajanan Cheulkarand another	…	Applicants
In the matter between
A. R. Choudhary and others	…	Petitioners
Vs.
Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and others	…	Respondents
WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.173 OF 2012 IN	W.P.	314 OF 2012
Vasudeo Ramchandra Rane	…	Applicant
In the matter between
A. R. Choudhary and others	…	Petitioners
Vs.
Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and others WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.174 OF 2012 IN	… W.P.	Respondents 314 OF 2012
Shamji Rupa Patel	…	Applicant
In the matter between
A. R. Choudhary and others	…	Petitioners

1/3

CHSW172&group_12.sxw

Vs.

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and others … Respondents

¶9

WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.177 OF 2012 IN W.P.314 OF 2012

¶10

Keshavji Hirji Patel … Applicant In the matter between A. R. Choudhary and others … Petitioners Vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and others … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.314 OF 2012 A. R. Choudhary and others … Petitioners Vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and others … Respondents

¶11

Ms Rajni Iyyer, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Karl Tamboly i/b. M/s. Vimal & Co. for Applicants in all Chamber Summons. Mr. Surendra Yadav for the Petitioner.

¶12

Mr. P. P. Chavan a/w. Mr. Suhas Kamble i/b. M/s. Navdeep Vora & Associates for Respondent No.1.

¶13

Mr. B. V. Phadnis i/b. M/s. Utangale & Co. for Respondent No.2. Dr. Birendra Saraf a/w. Mr. Prakash Shinde i/b. M/s. MDP & Partners for Respondent No.3.

¶14

CORAM : S. A. BOBDE & R. G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 27^TH SEPTEMBER, 2012

¶15

P.C.:

¶16

Having regard to the fact that respondent No.3 is proposing to give Gala Nos.G-2 to G-7 to which the intervenors claim entitlement, we are of the view that the Chamber Summonses for intervention should be allowed.

¶17

Chamber Summonses are accordingly allowed and stand disposed of as such.

¶18

2/3

¶19

CHSW172&group_12.sxw

¶20

WRIT PETITION NO.314 OF 2012

¶21

Parties agree that the dispute between them may be settled by mediation. Parties also agree that the Mediator shall be Mr. Kumbhakoni, Advocate, who is present in the Court.

¶22

The learned Mediator is requested to submit a report within four weeks from the date parties appear before him. Parties are directed to appear before the learned Mediator on 15^th October 2012. In particular, M.I.D.C. shall also participate the mediation.

¶23

Stand over to 20^th November 2012.

¶24

(R. G. KETKAR, J.)

¶25

(S. A. BOBDE, J.)

¶26

Minal Parab

¶27

3/3

Sujata G. Cheulkar and Anr- Applicant and A.R. Choudhary and 10 Ors. v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujata G. Cheulkar and Anr- Applicant and A.R. Choudhary and 10 Ors. v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghuvansh D.Bhasin Vs National Co-Op.Bank Ltd.

Vitthal P. Chopade Vs State of Maharashtra, through Social Welfare Dept and Ors.

Bandopanth Dhondiram Munj and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Narsi Raja Patel - Applicant and A.R. Choudhary and 10 Ors. Vs Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Ors.

Vrandavan Rahivasi Sangh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S. a. a. Enterprises and Anr. Vs the Municipal Corpn. of Gr. Mumbai and Anr.