The High Court dismissed the Central Excise appeal as the Revenue voluntarily conceded that the questions raised were settled against it by a prior Bombay High Court decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
1
CEXA97.04
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 97 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Central Excise
..... Appellant
Versus
R.B. Bahutule
..... Respondent
Mr. A.S. Rao for the appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &
R.D. DHANUKA, JJ. DATE : 12th SEPTEMBER, 2012.
P.C. :
The counsel for the Revenue fairly concedes that the questions raised in this
appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this court in the case of
Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. S.R. Enterprises reported in 2008 (9) STR 123
(Bom) . In this view of the matter, appeal is dismissed.
(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. S.R. EnterprisesFollowed¶17
2008 (9) STR 123 (Bom)
Commissioner of Central Excise
R.B. Bahutule
J.P. Devadhar
R.D. Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
