Single-paragraph notice-motion order where High Court condoned delay and made the notice absolute on affidavits. No substantive legal reasoning or precedent cited.
Notice of Motion made absolute after condoning delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
1
nma1465.09
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1465 OF 2009 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 97 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Central Excise ..... Appellant
Versus
M/s. R.B. Bahutule ..... Respondent Mr. A.S. Rao for the appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR & R.D. DHANUKA, JJ. DATE : 12th SEPTEMBER, 2012.
P.C. :
None for the respondent though served.
For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion, delay is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
The Commissioner of Central Excise
M/s. R.B. Bahutule
J.P. Devadhar
R.D. Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
