Shri. Laxmanrao Hanguji Yedatkar v. Dilip S/O Raosaheb Pole and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (Z) NO.343 OF 2012 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.188 OF 2010 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3119 OF 2005(D)
LAXMANRAO HANGUJI YEDATKAR ..VS..
DILIP RAOSAHEB POLE & OTH.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : JULY 23, 2012.
By this application the applicant seeks to amend cause title of the memo of Letters Patent appeal.
We have heard Mr. Ghare, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. R.L. Khapre, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Mr. Sonare, learned Assistant Government Pleader on behalf of respondent No.4.
For the reasons stated in the application the application is allowed and the applicant is permitted to amend the cause title.
The amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today.
JUDGE JUDGE
RRaut.
Laxmanrao Hanguji Yedatkar
Dilip Raoasheb Pole
P.V. Hardas
M.L. Tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court